POCO F6 5G vs POCO X6 Pro performance comparison: which POCO phone is the better performer?

The POCO F6 5G (review) launched in India with much excitement just a few weeks ago. Priced starting at Rs 29,999, it features the latest Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset, up to 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM, and 512GB of UFS 4.0 storage. The POCO X6 Pro (review) also comes with a similar set of hardware, with the exception of a MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset. Let’s compare the two phones and see which POCO phone is a better performer. 

Here are the key specifications of both devices: 

SmartphonePOCO F6 5GPOCO X6 Pro 5G
ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
GraphicsQualcomm Adreno 735Arm Mali-G615 MC6
MemoryUp to 12GB of RAM & 512GB of storageUp to 12GB of RAM & 512GB of storage

Geekbench

The Geekbench benchmark test evaluates the CPU performance of a smartphone. The POCO F6 scored 1930 on the single-core test and 5017 on the multi-core test. In comparison, the POCO X6 Pro registered 1239 on the single-core test and 4189 on the multi-core test. The result suggests that the POCO F6 should offer significantly better performance in both single-core and multi-core based tasks than the POCO X6 Pro. 

POCO F6 vs POCO X6 Pro

Winner: POCO F6 

AnTuTu

The AnTuTu benchmark test evaluates a smartphone’s comprehensive performance output, including aspects like its CPU performance, GPU performance, Memory performance (RAM + storage), and UX score (user experience score).

POCO F6 vs POCO X6 Pro

The benchmark thus offers a more holistic performance analysis. The POCO F6 registered an aggregate score of 15,09,605, while the POCO X6 Pro registered an aggregate score of 12,99,678. The POCO F6 exceeds the POCO X6 Pro in CPU, Memory performance, and user experience. 

Winner: POCO F6 

Throttling test

We used the Burnout benchmark test to evaluate the performance output of both devices under throttling. The POCO F6 registered a performance output of 56.6 percent, while the POCO X6 Pro registered a performance output of 70.1 percent under stress. As per the benchmark result, the POCO X6 Pro should offer better performance under extreme stress. 

POCO F6 vs POCO X6 Pro
POCO F6 (L) vs POCO X6 Pro (R)

Winner: POCO X6 Pro 

Gaming test

For our gaming test, we played some graphically demanding games, including COD: Mobile, BGMI and Real Racing 3, at similar graphical settings and for 30 minutes each. Both phones handle gaming splendidly and support the highest graphical resolution available in each game.

POCO F6 vs POCO X6 Pro

At Very High resolution in COD: Mobile, both phones delivered an average of 60FPS. In Real Racing 3, the POCO X6 delivered better frame rates, averaging around 105FPS, in comparison to the POCO F6’s 58FPS. That is because the game automatically adjusts the graphics as per your device specifications, and the POCO F6’s visual fidelity was higher compared to the POCO X6 Pro. In BGMI, both phones support Ultra HDR resolution and Ultra frame rate settings. The POCO F6 delivered around 54FPS consistently, while the POCO X6 Pro registered around 37FPS. 

When it comes to thermals, both phones do a tremendous job of minimising temperatures. The POCO F6’s average temperature rise in three games was about 4.67 degrees C, compared to 5.03 degrees C in the POCO X6 Pro. The POCO F6 wins the gaming test thanks to better gaming performance and temperature management. 

Winner: POCO F6  

Verdict

The results are clear. The POCO F6 outperforms the POCO X6 Pro in every performance metric, offers a better gaming experience, and is more capable of handling CPU and GPU-intensive tasks. The former is an easy recommendation for anyone who wants the best performance output possible under Rs 30,000. 

The POCO X6 Pro offers better stability than the POCO F6. The 12GB+512GB variant of the device costs less than the entry-level POCO F6, and in terms of performance, it is still a great deal for its price. The POCO X6 Pro is an excellent choice if you’re looking to save some money and can compromise a little when it comes to performance. 

Smartphones tested by Aditya Pandey & Ujjwal Sharma 

No posts to display