The MediaTek Dimensity 6020 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 power numerous budget and midrange smartphones available on the market. Both chipsets have a maximum clock speed of 2.2GHz, and their GPUs also top out at the same frequency. So, in this comparison of the Dimensity 6020 vs Snapdragon 695, we’ll examine the key differences in their specifications, AnTuTu, Geekbench, GFXBench, and PCMark scores, as well as the advantages of choosing one over the other.
Table of Contents
Dimensity 6020 vs Snapdragon 695: Key differences
Dimensity 6020 advantages over Snapdragon 695
- Dimensity 6020’s secondary cores have a tad higher clock speed than the Snapdragon 695‘s secondary cores.
- Dimensity 6020 can run videos in up to 2K resolution while the Snapdragon 695 is restricted to 1080p video playback.
Snapdragon 695 advantages over Dimensity 6020
- The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 is built on a 6nm node compared to Dimensity 6020’s 7nm node. This may result in better efficiency as transistors are tightly packed and require low power consumption to move electric current.
- Snapdragon 695 SoC scores high on benchmarks in comparison to MediaTek Dimensity 6020.
- The Snapdragon chip is equipped with advanced Bluetooth standards when compared to Dimensity 6020.
- Snapdragon 695 manages to deliver significantly higher GPU scores in benchmarking tests.
Dimensity 6020 vs Snapdragon 695: AnTuTu scores compared
To test a chipset’s capabilities on various fronts, the AnTuTu benchmark app runs rigorous tests on the device to judge the CPU, GPU, memory, and UX performance.
| ANTUTU (v10) | Dimensity 6020 | Snapdragon 695 |
| AnTuTu score | 3,91,929 | 4,01,418 |
| CPU | 1,29,189 | 1,20,025 |
| GPU | 45,821 | 99,725 |
| Memory | 1,08,480 | 72,741 |
| UX | 1,08,439 | 1,08,927 |
*Scores are based on tests conducted by 91mobiles.
Dimensity 6020 vs Snapdragon 695: Geekbench scores compared
Geekbench ascertains a chipset’s performance by putting a heavy load on the processor and tests its single-core and multi-core capabilities.
| GEEKBENCH SCORES | Dimensity 6020 | Snapdragon 695 |
| Single-core | 699 | 829 |
| Multi-core | 1,875 | 2,019 |
*Scores are based on tests conducted by 91mobiles.
Dimensity 6020 vs Snapdragon 695: GFXBench scores compared
GFXBench is a cross-platform benchmarking app for measuring and testing the 3D capabilities of a processor by stimulating detailed 3D environments.
| Tests | Dimensity 6020 | Snapdragon 695 |
| Manhattan (ran for 30 min) | 2,249 | 2,421 |
| T-Rex | 3,018 | 3,330 |
*Phones used for the test are Realme Narzo 60 (Dimensity 6020) and POCO X5 (Snapdragon 695).
Dimensity 6020 vs Snapdragon 695: PCMark scores compared
PCMark attempts to replicate real-world modern office tasks. The benchmark tests the device’s battery’s endurance by running hours-long tests. The phones ran this test overnight.
| Tests | Dimensity 6020 | Snapdragon 695 |
| PCMark battery performance | 16 hours 41 minutes | 16 hours 6 minutes |
*Phones used for the test are Realme Narzo 60 (Dimensity 6020) and POCO X5 (Snapdragon 695) equipped with a 5,000mAh battery.
Dimensity 6020 vs Snapdragon 695: technical specifications
| BASIS | Dimensity 6020 | Snapdragon 695 |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| CPU cores | Octa-core (8) | Octa-core (8) |
| CPU structure | 2 x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2×2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold 6×1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver |
| CPU architecture | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| Process node | 7nm | 6nm |
| GPU | ARM Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| GPU APIs | Information unavailable | OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, and Vulkan 1.1 |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4x |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Display resolution | FHD+ at 120Hz | FHD+ at 120Hz or HD+ at 120Hz |
| Display pixels | 1080×2520 | 900×1600 and 1080×2520 |
| Video playback | Up to 2K at 30FPS | Up to 1080p at 60FPS |
| Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Information unavailable | Qualcomm Spectra 346T |
| Single camera | Up to 64MP or 16MP + 16MP | Up to 108MP |
| Slow-motion video capture | Information unavailable | Up to 720p at 120FPS |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Supported | Supported |
| WiFi | Wi-FI 5 | Wi-Fi 4 and Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| Modem | Information unavailable | Snapdragon X51 |
| Cellular technology | 2G/ 3G/ 4G/ 5G sub-6 GHz and mmWave | 2G/ 3G/ 4G/ 5G sub-6 GHz and mmWave |
| Satellite systems | GLONASS, NavIC, Beidou, GPS, QZSS, and Galileo | GLONASS, NavIC, Beidou, GPS, QZSS, and Galileo |
| NFC | Not supported | Supported |
FAQs
Which processor is better, the Dimensity 6020 or the Snapdragon 695?
Both Dimensity 6020 and Snapdragon 695 are budget-centric mobile processors and fair equally well against each other, at least on benchmarks. However, the Snapdragon 695 may have the upper hand in efficiency as it’s built on a 6nm fabrication compared to the Dimensity 6020’s 7nm fabrication.
At what price are phones with Dimensity 6020 and Snapdragon 695 considered the best?
Both these processors are fairly old now and are considered to be great value when the phone rocking either of these chipsets is priced under or around Rs 15,000 in India.
Which processor is best for gaming, the Dimensity 6020 or the Snapdragon 695?
Both processors have octa cores and run at similar clock speeds, so the real-world gaming performance could be similar. However, how efficiently a processor handles games depends on the phone manufacturer’s tuning and optimisation.
